Tag Archives: ProfNet

ProfNet Connect Blog Roundup:Getting a Job at Google, Push Marketing, Benefits of Sales Coaching

ProfNet Connect, our free online community for journalists, bloggers, PR pros, experts and communicators of all stripes,  features blog section where members can write and post as their hearts desire.  The site is chockablock with interesting people and content.  Here are some of the most popular posts from this week. Enjoy!

How to Get a Job at Google: Mustache, No Pants
What does it take to get hired these days? Try a website, a video, a mustache, and no pants. A brilliant marketing campaign has been waged by a jobseeker Matthew Epstein targeting Google as his next employer. Take a look at this great story as told by Krista Bradford, CEO of The Good Search, LLC.
@KristaBradford

The Mall, Internet Shopping and Push Marketing
Are you a mall shopper or an online shopper? Do you believe that value makes the difference between engagement and avoidance? See what makes Beth Monaghan, principal and co-founder of InkHouse Media + Marketing want to stay at home to shop instead of joining the crowds like most of us.
@bamonaghan

Benefits of Sales Coaching
Sales coaching is the proactive manner to help support the mentoring provided for sales professionals to improve their performance and to help them when having difficulties and is usually done on a daily basis. Counseling is a reactive fractured approach implemented when an employee is performing below expectations due to either a skill deficiency or an attitude deficiency. Drew Stevens, president of Stevens Consulting Group explains the differences between sales counseling and sales coaching in his latest post.
@DrDrewSalesTips

Top ProfNet Connect Bloggers
Since launching in September of last year, there have been more than 1,100 blog posts from contributors across a variety of industries, from real estate to sales, public relations to media.  This is a list of some of the top bloggers on ProfNet Connect, in no particular order, as shared by Maria Perez, director of news operations at ProfNet.
@profnet

Stay abreast of conversations, trends and opportunities by joining us on ProfNet Connect, a free online community for journalists, bloggers and communications professionals to meet, connect and share their expertise.   Creating a profile on ProfNet connect adds a search-engine friendly element to your digital resume, bolsters your online reputation and enables you to showcase your expertise to media and bloggers.   Did we already mention that membership is free?  http://profnetconnect.com

PR & Journalism Blog Roundup: Threats to Quality Journalism, Changing the Perception of PR

From negative trends that threaten quality journalism to replacing the word ‘minorities.’ This is a roundup of 10 interesting PR- and media-related stories found online last week and brought to us by ProfNet editor Jason Hahn.
@jasonhahn

Following is a roundup of 10 interesting PR- and media-related stories found online last week:

Three Negative Trends That Threaten Quality Journalism: N. Ravi recently quit his post as editor of The Hindu, one of India’s largest English-language daily newspapers. In his resignation letter, he shines the spotlight on the problem of board members running a media institution “like a company producing plastic buckets with purely commercial considerations and unethical practices overwhelming editorial interests and values.” Ravi notes one positive trend in India’s newspaper industry (growing readership) and three negatives trends (dependence on advertising revenue, competing for the “average reader” and selling news space). (Guardian)

Next-Generation Data and Journalism: Contrary to popular belief, having more and better data about traffic to stories may be a good thing for journalism. For editors, this kind of data is a window into the how and why a post is getting a lot of traffic. Real-time analytics enables you to see all this as its happening. For The Atlantic, having these stats hasn’t sparked a race to the bottom with content catered to tasteless topics — it’s encouraged the publication to continue pumping out “weird” long-form technology-focused content. (The Atlantic)

Facebook Fan Page Analysis: KOMU-TV in Columbia, Mo.: This post analyzes how KOMU-TV in Columbia, Mo., is utilizing its Facebook fan page. One great feature is its tab dedicated to their team of anchors and news reporters. However, the page takes a bit of a risk by making its wall the first thing a visitor sees. The station might want to consider using a custom landing tab, if they can think of a value proposition and something worthwhile to incentivize liking their page. (Mediabistro’s 10,000 Words)

Eight Questions Every PR Job Seeker Thinks About: This post discusses eight questions that are likely on the mind of PR job seekers. For instance, how can a job seeker stand out from the crowd when submitting a resume via a company portal? Find a personal connection within the organization. What if a job seeker doesn’t have the agency experience desired? Demonstrate relevant and specific experience to the client or industry they’re looking for. What’s the most powerful thing a candidate can do to boost their appeal? Start a blog — yesterday. (Communications Conversations)

Homeless Man Wins Journalism Award: Jose Espinosa used to be an insurance salesman and an actor. He now lives in Philadelphia’s largest homeless shelter. Despite his circumstances, Espinosa won an international award from the International Network of Street Papers for his profile of Matthew Saad Muhammad, a fellow shelter resident and the former light-heavyweight boxing champion of the world. The story was written for the One Step Away, a “street paper” written and distributed almost entirely by people who are homeless. (6abc.com)

Seven Ways to Change the Perception of PR: Many perceive the PR industry to be a distasteful group of miscreants that lies, cheats and manipulates to get what they want. Regardless of reality, the industry truly does have a “perception issue” — just like many others do. PR professionals trying to avoid being “tarred with the same brush” should take note of these seven tips. Among them are to tell the truth (and advise your clients to tell the truth), be open to criticism and be transparent in your online activities. (Spin Sucks)

Business Journalists Rely on Social Media: A survey from Arketi Web Watch shows how much business journalists use different online and offline sources for stories. The results show that 56 percent of business journalists look to blogs, 44 percent look to microblogs (e.g., Twitter) and 39 percent look to social networking sites. These findings point to the potential for connecting with these journalists via these channels and standing out from the crowd. (Simply Zesty)

How to Write a Press Release: This post is simply an overview of how to write a high-quality press release. It goes over some important guidelines — such as writing in the present tense, writing concisely and clearly, and putting the most important information first — along with 10 steps to follow. (Kerrmunications)

Bloggers Are Promotional Partners, and That’s Bad for PR: “In the evolution of social media, somehow blogger outreach became equated with public relations’ pitching to journalists, and so for years it’s been largely the domain of PR coordinators and account executives.” PR should not be primarily tasked with reaching out to bloggers. While some PR pros would disagree, since social media is about relationships, the rub is that bloggers are not journalists, and that blogger-outreach programs are paid media. Bloggers should be paid/compensated partners, and PR firms must convince clients to hand over some of their media budgets, then learn how to create smart, clever and measurable promotional partnerships with bloggers. (Social Media Explorer)

Is it Time for Journalists to Stop Using the Term ‘Minorities’?: The word “minorities” has long been used to describe people who are not white, but with changing demographics rendering the term outdated, is it time to stop using it? David Minthorn, deputy standards editor at the Associated Press, said the AP isn’t considering a change in usage, though he expects “other precise terms will emerge as the situation evolves.” But even those who would like to see a replacement for the word have trouble thinking of a better alternative. (Poynter)

Stay abreast of conversations, trends and opportunities by joining us on ProfNet Connect, a free online community for journalists, bloggers and communications professionals to meet, connect and share their expertise.   Creating a profile on ProfNet connect adds a search-engine friendly element to your digital resume, bolsters your online reputation and enables you to showcase your expertise to media and bloggers.   Did we already mention that membership is free?  http://profnetconnect.com

ProfNet Connect Blog Round Up – Rude Reporters, Hashtags 101, Building Communities

A snapshot of blogs on ProfNet Connect. Click the image to browse them all.

ProfNet Connect, our free online community for journalists, bloggers, PR pros, experts and communicators of all stripes,  features blog section where members can write and post as their hearts desire.  The site is chockablock with interesting content.  Here are some of the most popular posts from this week. Enjoy!

Why is That Reporter Rude?
http://www.profnetconnect.com/heidirafferty/blog/2011/08/03/why_is_that_reporter_rude
If you’re a PR practitioner, there’s no doubt you’ve probably asked yourself, “Why is that reporter so rude?” Heidi Rafferty, a freelance writer and editor answers this question and provides some excellent insight into why this can happen.
@heidiraff

Weekly Roundup: Branding Journalists, Using Wikipedia for PR and the Master of AP Style

http://www.profnetconnect.com/jasonhahn/blog/2011/08/01/weekly_roundup:_branding_journalists,_using_wikipedia_for_pr_and_the_master_of_ap_style

Jason Hahn, an editor at ProfNet offers this roundup of 10 interesting PR- and media-related stories found online last week.
@jasonhahn

Dear Gracie: Hashtags 101
http://www.profnetconnect.com/gracelavigne/blog/2011/08/03/dear_gracie:_hashtags_101
Each week, Dear Gracie (ProfNet editor Grace Lavigne) answers questions from ProfNet Connect readers with advice from our network of more than 44,000 ProfNet experts. This week she tackles the question, “I’m an amateur Twitter user, and it’s not clear to me how and why I should use #hashtags. Since I can search for keywords on Twitter, I don’t understand what the difference is. What purpose do they serve? And is there a wrong way to use them? Sometimes I see really long hashtags — what’s the point?”
@GNightGracie

August MEDIAware
http://www.profnetconnect.com/kevinfrey/blog/2011/08/02/august_mediaware
MEDIAware aims to bring you a selection of the most important media updates from the thousands available every day via MEDIAtlas, plus key media moves on the horizon, and a synopsis of interesting media news. Kevin Frey, senior media researcher at PR Newswire offers up this report each month.
@kfrey

Building an Online Community: Lessons Learned from ProfNet Connect
http://www.profnetconnect.com/sazzollini/blog/2011/08/03/building_an_online_community:_lessons_learned_from_profnet_connect
Sandra Azzollini, the director of online content and community at PR Newswire shares her insight on ProfNet Connect, the free online community we launched last year to connect journalists, bloggers, public relations pros, and experts. The site is coming up on its first anniversary in September and we’re taking a little time to reflect on our first year (so far) and to share some things we’ve learned about building an online community.
@sazzollini

Building an Online Community: Lessons Learned from ProfNet Connect

The ProfNet Connect team: Sandy Azzollini, Evelyn Tipacti & Maria Perez

ProfNet Connect, the free online community we launched last year to connect journalists, bloggers, public relations pros an experts,   is coming up on its first anniversary in September.  We’re taking a little time today to reflect on our first year (so far) and to share some things we’ve learned about building an online community.

ProfNet always had loyal groups of users, both in public relations and in journalism, so we thought these groups might be interested in connecting and sharing information.  Within the first month of launch, we had confirmation with thousands of people registering for the site.   My colleagues Maria Perez (@profnet) and Evelyn Tipacti (@EditorEv) and I had our work cut out for us.

While it was gratifying to see so many interested people, the pressure was definitely on for us to deliver.  It was imperative that we continue to grow not just registrants, but interactions too. We will be the first to admit we were flying a bit by the seats of our pants in terms of how to manage and grow a community, we still experiment with tactics on a regular basis, but we were able to get some advice along the way.

Developing a content strategy for the community

Since ProfNet is part of PR Newswire, we were able to access the wealth of knowledge from our own social media experts and those of our parent company. A sister company to PR Newswire, DeusM , is the force behind such great online communities as Light Reading, Internet Evolution and Enterprise Efficiency. We followed advice of its founder, Stephen Saunders, when it came to the frequency of publishing content.  From the very beginning, we knew we need a minimum of three new pieces of content a day to keep our community coming back for more so we set that as our goal.

Once we had this goal, we were challenged to find a way to keep up. The good people at The Poynter Institute suggested to us that even though we weren’t a traditional media outlet, that did not mean we couldn’t follow some basic traditional journalist modes of operation. That’s when we started working with an editorial calendar and weekly editorial meetings. The calendar allowed us to organize our efforts and see where regular columns could fit in. The meetings gave us time to brainstorm new ideas. It’s also a time to reflect weekly on what is working and what is not.

We also learned it’s OK to promote ourselves. At Poynter, the 80/20 rule was mentioned. If you have good content 80% of the time, your audience will forgive your promoting yourself 20% of the time. We found this specifically in our main product, ProfNet Queries.  We started to include links to content we had written on ProfNet Connect in our query email feeds, almost as if it was a newsletter.  The content was related to the industry our customers are in, not just a random advertisement. It was a risk, one we would have pulled away from quickly if it failed, but we found that most of our customers liked what they were reading.  We also discovered how effective email marketing can be.

Evolving the community site features

We learned from the Agile development process that when you take regular intervals to review what is working and what is not in a very safe environment, it make it easier to implement other changes on in your process or your site. There were a number of user experience issues that came up over the year since launch. As a result of our process and platform, we are able to adjust features. We learned the site must constantly evolve with new features or placement of new features and that surveying and testing is critical to this process. You can’t be afraid to fail with something new, just fail quickly and move on.

Where we are today

As a result of our tactics, ProfNet Connect has been performing phenomenally.  In June 2011, the site had page views double from the prior month and there were over a third more unique monthly visitors to the site. Searches for profiles are up as well as we find people are using the site to “connect” with one another.   We found once we got organized, we got results and our community really started to grow. Our work isn’t done – caring for and guiding a community with thousands of members like ProfNet Connect is an ongoing task, and we know that to build on the success we found in the first year, we have to maintain our focus.  But that’s okay.   Caring for something you love is easy!

Author Sandra Azzollini is PR Newswire’s director of online content and community.

Public Relations Plays a Vital Role in the News Cycle

Popular New York Times columnist David Pogue is well known for actively engaging with his cohorts in public relations, maintaining an active dialogue with PR pros, and speaking at industry events, sharing his perspective on creating effective pitches and working effectively with journalists.   However, his session titled “Pitch Me, Baby” at Ragan Communications’ Media Relations Summit, a paid event, didn’t sit well with the Times’ staff, and they moved to prohibit Pogue participating in that session, or similar events in the future.

Public editor Arthur S. Brisbane discussed the decision earlier this month, noting: “…Such appearances are explicitly prohibited by The Time’s ethics policy. Excerpts of the relevant portions: Staff members may not advise individuals or organizations how to deal successfully with the news media (though they may of course explain the paper’s normal workings and steer outsiders to the appropriate Times person)….They should not take part in public relations workshops that charge admission or imply privileged access to Times people….”  Pogue agreed not appear at anymore PR events.

However, some of the characterizations and allusions in Brisbane’s editorial left a bad taste in many PR professional’s mouths. Pogue’s public admission of his reliance on publicists caused some discomfort in the Grey Lady’s upper echelons.

“Times readers deserve to be assured that journalists don’t get too cozy with the P.R. professionals who strive to influence coverage,” wrote Brisbane. “A virtual army of publicists, media specialists and others stands ready every day to infiltrate the news with stories that help their employers.”

Not surprisingly, Brisbane’s comments elicited enough feedback from the public relations quarter that he was compelled earlier this week to muse whether or not PR is a bane or boon to journalists, and put several questions forth, asking readers how they felt about the Times’ reliance on PR for stories, and querying the PR community about the benefits public relations delivers to Times staff.

PR Newswire sits squarely between professional media and public relations practitioners, and media relations has always been important to us.  Our editors help clients polish their press releases, catching mistakes, authenticating sources, adding attribution when needed and refusing copy that doesn’t meet standards.  Our audience development and research teams work with news outlets, web portals, journalists, bloggers and freelancers worldwide to ensure they can find and access the content they need, in the manner most convenient for them. Along the way, we get a lot of feedback about public relations and press releases.   So I put one of Brisbane’s questions — What are the benefits that publicists and P.R. professionals can provide to The Times? Are there any problems? – to my colleagues here at PR Newswire.

Former television journalists and long-time media relations manager Brett Simon agreed with Pogue’s view that a smart PR person can save a journalist valuable time, noting a savvy publicist can help a reporter find the right people to talk to in an organization as they’re fleshing out a story.

“Publicists can lay a vital role in securing the right person for journalists’ stories and they can do so with expediency.  PR folks at corporations and other organizations are keenly aware of who does what, their nature of expertise, access to their contact information and can quickly make the person available,” she told me. The benefit to the journalist is clear, as well, she noted, “This saves the reporter valuable time by not having to call around to find the appropriate person.   PR people do all the leg work and the journalist can get the credit.”

Victoria Harres, PR Newswire’s director of audience development, noted the role public relations plays in surfacing stories, and reminded us that non-profits and NGOs also make use of PR.

“Public relations people play an important role in bringing things to the attention of journalists. There are not enough journalists in the world to make sure that every story worth telling is told,” she said. “A good PR person will understand individual journalists’ beats and provide relevant information that help journalists do their jobs without spending significant amounts of time finding out when events are happening, when products are launching, or if there is a coordinated effort to send money and aid to some part of the world where tragedy has struck. Let’s not forget non-profits also use PR professionals to make sure their stories are told.”

Christine Cube, another former journalist and another of our media relations managers, commented on the legwork public relations pros do for journalists.

“PR adds a great deal to the news cycle. Without it, there are a lot of gray areas. And whether journalists want to admit it or not, PR helps clear up that gray. It provides background info, story ideas, and produces the principles who can speak to a specific subject or matter,” she said.

Maria Perez, director of news operations for ProfNet, discussed the role public relations plays in facilitating communications between a journalist and an organization, and their role in finding and connecting journalists on deadline with relevant experts.

“Not all subject matter experts are experts at dealing with the media,” she noted. “PR professionals are. Working through a PR professional can help facilitate the process and improve communication. Furthermore, because PR professionals often represent several clients, working with them can help journalists choose from a larger pool of experts, ensuring that a variety of voices are heard. Finally, PR professionals often know what’s going on in their client’s industry, and can add facets to the story that would otherwise be overlooked.”

Tom Hynes, manager of blogger relations for PR Newswire (and yes, another former journalist on our staff) commented upon the negative perception many have for public relations, and the fact that minds change quickly when a fast-breaking story or crisis situation unfolds.

“I feel like there’s probably a lot of unjust scorn or derision aimed at PR professionals,” he said. “For this discussion, I’ll liken that to the chiropractic practice. You may think it’s a quack science — until you throw your back out. You may think PR professionals are unnecessary — until you have a crisis situation that needs deft and professional communicating.”

Harres and Perez both offered comment on the responsibilities of the professional journalists in this discussion.

“One sentence in Brisbane’s post that stood out for me is that he asks about “how the PR industry influences The Times,” Perez noted. “I would like to think the PR industry does *not* influence journalists, but provides journalists with the information necessary regarding their client. If a journalist can be “influenced” by a PR person, that’s a problem.”

Harres also noted the roles played by both sides, and the responsibility of the professional journalist in the development of a story.

“A good PR professional tells a story from a particular perspective. A good journalist will look at all sides and angles of a story and tell it in an unbiased fashion,” Harres commented. “The public relations perspective should be considered in this process. It is a very valid element in putting together a clear picture.”

Simon summed it up well. “PR folks are a journalist’s friend. Yes, they may sometimes annoy reporters with useless pitches but when a New York Times reporter needs them for a story, you can bet that publicist is going to go beyond the call of duty to help that journalist out.  In today’s deadline driven news cycle, with journalists providing content across multiple platforms, a PR person can be a tremendous source of people/experts and information.”

Author Sarah Skerik is PR Newswire’s vice president of social media.

10 Tips for Tweeting as a Brand

The Profnet presence Maria has cultivated on Twitter

When I was asked to start tweeting as @profnet back in May 2008, I had a moment – OK, several moments – of panic. I had just heard of Twitter and had no idea what I was doing. (Some would say I still don’t, but that’s neither here nor there.)

Apart from queries, what the heck would I tweet about? And why would anyone care about anything I had to say? There were many moments when I would type a tweet, delete it, retype it, edit it, delete it and type it again – and then hold my breath as I hit the “send” button.

So what did I do? I found a mentor. For me, it was my colleague Vicky Harres. I respected what Vicky was doing on the @prnewswire feed, and decided to study her tweets and learn as much from her as I could.

What I learned: Friendliness and professionalism are not mutually exclusive. Your tweets can be conversational and still be professional. There’s no reason you can’t show a little personality, but remember: First and foremost, you are tweeting as @yourbrand, not as @you.

Am I an expert on Twitter? Certainly not, although I do think I’ve found a good balance between “official tweets” and “Maria tweets” (aside from my Snuggie obsession of 2009, which I’ve chosen to forget). So, please take my suggestions below as just that – suggestions from someone who tweets for a brand.

Find a Twitter mentor. If you follow someone who you think gets it right, learn from her. What does she tweet about? How often does she tweet? How often does she re-tweet? How does she re-tweet (does she just re-send the original tweet verbatim, or does she put her own spin on it)? When and how does she reply to negative tweets? When and how does she reply to positive tweets? If your mentor is open to it, run a few tweets by her and see what, if any, changes she would make.

Keep it positive. As tempting as it sometimes might be, avoid being negative, sarcastic or snarky. No matter how funny you think it might be, always remember that you’re tweeting as your brand, not as you.

Respond to negative feedback. If someone says something negative about your brand and you don’t respond, the tweet that lingers is the negative one. However, there are two caveats: 1) Be thoughtful in your response. You don’t have to respond immediately. It’s better to take time to think your response through. 2) Beware attempts to bait you. Weigh the pros and cons of responding. If you decide not to respond publicly, consider a direct message instead.

Steer away from controversy. Controversial topics (politics, religion) are controversial for a reason – there are people who are vehemently on one side or the other. Why alienate either?

Humor is subjective. There will always be someone who thinks your joke is in poor taste or inappropriate, so while I don’t think you should censor yourself, stay away from topics or language/slang that might be taken the wrong way.

Get a second opinion. If there’s something you want to tweet but you aren’t sure whether it’s appropriate, ask your mentor for his opinion. And if you’re still not sure, follow the next rule:

When in doubt, leave it out. This golden rule of writing also applies to tweets. If you have any doubts, don’t tweet it.

Don’t get too personal. Tweeting about Snuggies is innocuous. Tweeting about hemorrhoids or ingrown toenails is not.

Follow your followers. I know not everyone will agree with this, but if you want to promote conversation with your followers, you have to follow them back. I explained my reasoning for this in a previous post, To Follow or Not to Follow: Take the Auto-Follow Challenge. When I see someone whose following/follower ratio is pretty even, I find myself thinking that he is more open, and that makes me more likely to interact with him.

It’s not about @you. I come back to this because it’s really the mother of all rules, the one from which all the other rules grow. Every tweet represents your company – whether it’s in a positive or negative way is up to you.

Do you tweet for a brand? What do you think of these rules? Are there any you disagree with? Are there any I missed?

Author Maria Perez is director of news operations for Profnet, and she’s the voice behind @profnet on Twitter.  She blogs actively on Profnet Connect – a free interactirtsve community linking PR pros, bloggers, journalists and experts.

A Day in the Life of a Freelancer

Have you ever wondered what a typical day is like for freelance writers? Or how they get their assignments from publications? Or what their writing process is like?

On Tuesday, March 29, ProfNet hosted a Twitter-based chat featuring freelancer Gina Roberts-Grey.

Roberts-Grey is a prolific writer, covering health, consumer issues and finance for a variety of print and online markets. She has written for Glamour, Parents, Better Homes & Gardens, Self, Woman’s Day, EverydayHealth.com, MSN.com, AARP The Magazine and more. She also specializes in celebrity profiles and has interviewed actors, politicians, singers, athletes, reality TV stars and other celebs.

As if that weren’t enough, she also chairs the annual ASJA conference, the largest freelance writers conference in the country.

PR Pitches

Most of Roberts-Grey’s articles, about 70 percent, are assigned to her by editors at publications for which she has previously written; the rest are from story ideas she pitches to editors.  Many of those ideas come from pitches she receives from PR professionals.

Roberts-Grey said she receives about 150 PR pitches per day. Many of those are deleted pretty quickly. “If it doesn’t grab me the right way,” she said. “It’s outta here.”

She prefers to receive pitches via email. “Phone is an interruption,” she said. However, she is open to receiving pitches via Twitter. “Twitter pitches would be very cool. It hasn’t happened yet, but I’d love that!”

To get her attention, include a “great, snappy, grabbing lead,” she said. “The subject line should tell me why I should open the e-mail. What is the pitch about? The ones that read like a headline from the Enquirer often aren’t opened.”

Also, keep it short. “Two paragraphs is a nice size,” she said, “enough to whet the appetite, and I can ask for more info if needed.”

Whenever possible, include links to statistics and professional quotes. “Links in pitches are helpful to dig deeper and see if I can use it in a piece.” If you have a PDF of a study or research paper, include that in your pitch, as well.

Once you’ve sent a pitch, don’t follow up via phone unless you know the writer doesn’t mind phone follow-ups. And if a writer says, “I don’t know when this will run,” leave it at that. Don’t contact the writer every week to see if the article has run yet. Set up a Google Alert for your expert’s name, and you’ll know when the article (and any article mentioning your expert) has been published.

Finding Sources

Roberts-Grey said her typical workday averages 12 to 14 hours, with much of that time devoted to finding and interviewing sources. “Finding the right source definitely speeds things up,” she said, “and having a great working relationship with them to go to again helps.”

Roberts-Grey often uses ProfNet to find sources for her articles. When responding to one of her queries, make sure the answer is on-topic and precise. “Tell me what you can do to make my article the best, why you are the best,” she suggested.

Once she finds the sources she needs for an article, Roberts-Grey prefers to do as much of the interviewing as possible by email to help maximize her time. During the interview, get right to the point and answer questions as specifically as possible. She will follow-up by phone if she has any unanswered questions.

Building Relationships

Roberts-Grey also stressed the importance of building relationships with writers. Often, an interview is not a one-time thing, and reporters will use experts in multiple stories.

“I often go back to those I’ve used before, if they’ve been good,” she said. “I like to add them to the stable and use them as much as possible.”

The first step in building a relationship with a writer is to make sure you spell their name correctly. As basic as it sounds, Roberts-Grey said she receives many pitches where people do not get her name right.

Also, make sure to personalize the pitch. “’Dear Writer’ or ‘Dear Editor’ = delete,” she said. “Take time to know whom you are pitching.”

Most importantly, get to know what topics the writer covers, and how they want to be contacted.

Networking

Roberts-Grey also shared more information about the annual American Society of Journalists and Authors conference, commonly known as ASJA2011, taking place April 29-May 1 in New York City.

“ASJA2011 is the premiere conference for writers in all stages of their career,” said Roberts-Grey, “but we also have lots of PR people who want to network.”

The conference is open to public April 30 and May 1, and has sessions on honing your craft, marketing, social media and more.

“It’s a great place to rub elbows with writers and to pick their brains regarding pitches they want, how to pitch them, etc.,” said Roberts-Grey.

The conference has more than 125 magazine editors, literary agents and book publishers, “so there are lots of people to network with,” said Roberts-Grey, who said she has made lots of great relationships and even done interviews with sources while at the conference. “Networking really is everything these days. You’ve got to make contacts.”

Author Maria Perez is director of news operations for ProfNet, a service that helps journalists find expert sources. For a full transcript of the chat, visit Maria’s blog on ProfNet Connect at http://www.profnetconnect.com/profnetmaria/blog/

Submitting ProfNet Queries: Guidelines for Reporters, Authors and Bloggers

Last week, I wrote about guidelines for PR professionals and experts on responding to ProfNet queries.

Turnabout is fair play, so here are a few guidelines for reporters, authors and bloggers for submitting ProfNet queries. Some of these are part of ProfNet’s query submission policies and might cause us to reject or revise the query; others are just good guidelines to follow to ensure you have the best possible working relationships with PR professionals and their sources.

* Whenever possible, include the name of the news outlet in the query. There are, of course, some instances when that is not possible, such as in cases of proprietary story ideas or skittish editors, but you’re likely to get more and better responses if you include the specific outlet for which you’re writing.

* Include as much detail as possible about the kind of expertise/responses you’re looking for. If you’re looking for experts in a particular geographic area or with specific credentials, include that in the query.

* When choosing your deadline for responses, provide as much time as possible. Of course, for breaking news or last-minute stories, you may need responses within a few hours, but if you can extend your time frame at all, you’ll get more responses.

* If you are a freelancer and are in the pitching stage or are writing the article on spec, indicate that in the query, as well as to which outlet(s) you’re pitching the piece. We can still run the query, but sources should be aware that the article has not yet been assigned.

* If a query is on a controversial/political topic, please try to keep it as unbiased as possible. Emotions run high, and there are ways to get the information you need without alienating possible sources. While we try not to edit queries so as to leave the reporter’s voice intact, we may request revisions if it’s likely to become an issue.

* Product requests: This is a relatively new type of query, and we are seeing more and more of these as blogs become more prevalent. We’re happy to help with these, but realize that many companies are understandably skittish about providing samples, so the more information you can provide about the blog (statistics about page views, Google Rank, Facebook/Twitter followers, etc.), the better the chances you’ll get responses. If you can return the product sample after reviewing it, all the better, but if not, make sure you indicate that in the query so companies are aware before they provide the sample to you. We also require that blogs comply with the FTC blogger guidelines regarding product reviews, and that companies will not be requested to provide any sort of payment in order to have their products reviewed. In addition, blogs must be live and actively publishing for at least six months before a product request will be sent. Any violation of the above will result in a ban from using ProfNet services in the future.

* For queries from authors of fiction books, indicate how responding to the query will benefit the experts. Fiction books, by their nature, do not provide experts with an opportunity to be quoted, so any benefit (such as the expert being mentioned in the book’s acknowledgements section) should be mentioned in the query.

* Student queries: We do not run queries for class assignments, but we do run student queries if the article is being written for the university’s newspaper or another established publication. When submitting the query, indicate which news outlet the article is slated for.

* Respond to respondents: I know this one might be a bit controversial, but if you can let respondents know you got their e-mail, it would go a long way into fostering good will. Imagine yourself as the PR person, answering a query and then not hearing back as to whether the e-mail ever even went through. Now imagine yourself as that same PR person, who replied to a query and got an e-mail response from the journalist. In which instance will you be more likely to respond to the reporter’s next query? This doesn’t mean you have to personally reply to each and every one – with the volume of responses, that might turn into a full-time job in and of itself – but a simple automated return message (“Thank you for your e-mail. I’ll be reviewing all responses over the next few days, and will touch base if your expert is a fit. If you don’t hear from me, please know that I appreciate your response and will keep your expert in mind for future stories,”) can help foster good working relationships with PR pros.

* If possible, follow up with PR reps when an article their expert is quoted in is published. While many freelancers aren’t necessarily even notified themselves when an article runs, and many articles can run weeks or months after the interview has taken place – or not at all – if you do know, sources would appreciate the head’s up.

Reporters: What are your thoughts on this list? Do any strike you as unreasonable?

PR pros/experts: Anything I missed? What would you add to this list?

Author Maria Perez is director of news operations for ProfNet, a service that helps journalists find expert sources. You can read more from Maria at her blog on ProfNet Connect, a free social network connecting PR professionals, experts and the media: http://www.profnetconnect.com/profnetmaria/blog/

A day in the life of a ProfNet query

Profnet experts database and media placement

Have you ever wondered what happens to a ProfNet query from the time a reporter sends it to ProfNet to the time it gets to your e-mail inbox? The answer, for most queries, is: quite a bit.

ProfNet has an experienced editorial staff that reviews every reporter query. We look at a variety of things: Is the query from a legitimate journalist/news outlet? Does the query make sense? Do the URLs listed in the query work? Are there any typos? Is the reporter sending the query to all the appropriate places?

I thought it might be interesting to remove the veil, if you will, and show you the steps we take to get ProfNet queries to you.

Step 1: Verify the Sender

All journalists and bloggers who use ProfNet to find sources are entered into a registration system shared by PR Newswire for Journalists. When a query comes in, we check the registration system to see whether the sender has used ProfNet before. For first-time users, we confirm their credentials: Do they have an on-staff e-mail address? If a freelancer, have they been published before? If not, do they have an assignment we can verify with the publication’s editor?

For bloggers, we check that the blog has been live for six months. If the blogger is requesting products, we look to see whether the blog covers the type of products they’re asking for (e.g., if a beauty blogger is requesting cell phones to review, we’ll question that). We also confirm the blog complies with the FTC guidelines for bloggers, and that they do not charge fees of any kind in order to review products.

Step 2: Review Query Content

Once we have confirmed the sender’s info, we move on to reviewing the query itself. Does the reporter provide enough information about the publication? Do the URLs listed in the query work? Is the content appropriate? Are there any typos or misspellings?

We try not to judge the content itself, or edit it too much, in order to keep the reporter’s voice. For the most part, we’ll mostly check for typos and change the text according to Associated Press style, which provides uniformity and makes queries easier to read.

You may also have noticed some queries include “I’m a freelancer.” We add that to queries from freelancers to provide another level of information to subscribers, as well as to prevent the publication from receiving unwanted direct calls.

Step 3: Review Distribution Options

After reviewing the query content, we check the reporter’s distribution instructions. For example, if the reporter is interested only in respondents from the Northeast, we include a note to that effect at the beginning of the query (“Limited to the Northeast”). This way, if you or your expert are not in the Northeast, you know right away that you can skip the query.

We also look at the institution types the reporter has chosen. Journalists can send queries to any of 14 institution types: activists; analysts; authors, speakers and consultants; bloggers; CSR officers; colleges and universities; corporations; government agencies and laboratories; hospitals and medical centers; legislative offices; media and broadcast companies (the PR officers at those institutions – not other journalists); nonprofit organizations; public relations agencies; and small businesses.

If a reporter is looking for authors of environmental books, for example, and have only chosen the query to be sent to the Authors, Speakers and Consultants group, we might counsel the journalist to expand the search to colleges and universities, which may have professors of environmental science that have authored a book on the topic, and PR agencies, in case they represent such authors or their publishing houses. Ultimately,  however, it’s the reporter’s decision.

Step 4: Add Query Coding

When subscribers join ProfNet, they have the option of choosing from 13 query categories: Arts, Entertainment and Media; Banking and Personal Finance; Computers and Telecom; Corporate Social Responsibility; Education; General Industry; Government and Public Issues; Health and Medicine; Law, Crime and Justice; Living; Management and Workplace; Science and World Regions.

In addition, each category has dozens of subcategories, allowing for further targeting of queries to ensure subscribers only get the kinds of queries they want.

Once we have completed steps 1-3, we code the query for the appropriate categories and subcategories. So, for example, if a subscriber is interested only in health queries, they can opt not to receive queries on banking, real estate, sports or other unrelated topics, saving them valuable time.

We then also add a heading to the query (e.g., HEALTH, BANKING, MANAGEMENT), to make it even easier for subscribers to scan queries. In cases where a reporter is looking for regular people, rather than experts, we’ll use NON-EXPERT as the heading.

Step 5: To Tweet or not to Tweet?

If you follow @profnet on Twitter, you know we sometimes tweet urgent reporter queries, as well. If a reporter has a same-day deadline, we will ask her if she wants us to post the query on Twitter. We will only tweet the query with the reporter’s approval.

 

And that’s pretty much it. Seems fairly simple, right? Most times, it is. On average, we require clarification on about 10-15 queries per day. Many of them are fairly straightforward (“What publication is this for?”). Others can be a bit more complicated. But we always have our subscribers in mind. We ask the questions so you don’t have to.

So, what do you think? Did any of the steps surprise you? Are there any steps you think we should add?

Authored by Maria Perez, director – news operations, ProfNet.

Free Publicity Tools from ProfNet

Did you know free publicity tools available from ProfNet, can help you promote your organizations’ experts, connect with media, bloggers, and peers, and stay on top of journalist queries for expert sources?  As budgets dwindle and PR departments continue to do more with fewer resources, we thought that highlighting some of the free PR services from ProfNet would be useful to you.

Tweeting urgent queries from journalists seeking sources:  @ProfNet

Journalists on deadline seeking sources have long turned to ProfNet for help.  Today, our expert network also taps the power of Twitter.  Urgent, last minute queries from reporters are tweeted from the @ProfNet account.  Follow that account and keep an eye on it for last minute opportunities for coverage.   And while you’re at it, be sure to watch for the monthly #connectchat, a dialogue on Twitter hosted by @ProfNet.

If you see a tweet from @ProfNet that is right on target with your (or your expert’s) expertise, it’s important to respond right away.  Reporters are on deadline – this is no time to show up late.   Other tips to help you respond successfully include:

  • Put all basic contact info: name, title, phone numbers and e-mail addresses, both for the suggested source and for yourself in your emailed response.
  • Include a  brief summary of the source’s relevant credentials, and a summary of the source’s perspective
  • Copy and paste the query title or language from the Tweet in your subject line, so the reporter can quickly recognize your message as a response to his/her query.
  • Do not send attachments, unless the reporter has specifically asked for them.  At this stage, you’ll do better keeping it short and sweet, and sending a link to more detailed information.
  • Link to your ProfNet Connect profile to deliver more information (more on that below.)

Connecting communicators, experts, media and bloggers:

More than 40,000 communicators, experts and media can be found on ProfNet Connect, a free an interactive community designed to foster dialogue and connections between experts and media.  The key to success on ProfNet Connect?  Your (or your expert’s) profile. Your profiles – and those you create for the experts you’re promoting – are the cornerstones of your presence on ProfNet Connect.  There, you can add rich details of your expertise, along with additional content such as white papers and articles.  In addition to attracting visibility on the ProfNet Connect network, profiles can also be shared, and are great ways to provide additional information on an expert without creating a huge email file with multiple, unwieldy attachments. Profiles have the added bonus of being search engine friendly – providing one more outlet for your information on the web, which helps build your online visibility.   In addition, relevant expert profiles can be embedded into your press releases, using ProfNet links.

ProfNet Links – embedding and distributing expert profiles

ProfNet Links enables you to embed links to your experts’ ProfNet Connect profiles within press releases, promoting the availability of the expert. This helps journalists reading the press release to take immediate action to pursue the story by reviewing information on experts or sources for quotation, creating new exposure for your experts and increasing the chance that your story will get used.

PR Newswire will include ProfNet Links at no charge with any press release issued.   . All that’s required is a ProfNet Connect profile, and a quick registration process that will link your experts with your Online Member Center account enabling you to select and include relevant experts with each press release.

Ready to get started?  Here’s what you need to do.

  • Follow @profnet on Twitter.  While you’re at it, follow @prnewswire too, for even more information on media, new media, and journalism.
  • Go to http://www.profnetconnect.com and build your own profile. Once you’ve done that, you’ll be able to add profiles for any experts you wish to promote, as well.
  • Be sure to put your PR Newswire account number in your profile.  Doing so will link your expert profiles with the Online Member Center, enabling you to select and embed expert profiles for each press release you issue.
  • Start interacting with the ProfNet Connect community.  Blog posts are a great way to introduce your expertise.

Take advantage of these free publicity services from ProfNet and PR Newswire, and watch your PR programs and online visibility grow!

Authored by Sarah Skerik, VP social media, PR Newswire.